Monday, October 31, 2005
Wait a Sec

I don't think while this investigation and this legal proceeding is ongoing, that we should make such presumptions. We should let that process continue.
So, let me get this straight. For the last two years, before the indictment, he couldn't comment because the investigation was ongoing. Now, after the indictment, he can't comment because the legal proceeding is ongoing. So, the only possible situation where he could have commented was when there was no indictment. But then there wouldn't have been anything to comment on anyway. How convenient.
Can someone please stop them from getting away with this? Please?
Friday, October 28, 2005
The Big Picture

Canada's Katrina - No Hurricane Necessary
I've lived in four countries other than Canada and for the most part, I can hold my head high as a Canadian (but not get all preachy, you know, 'cos no one likes that). The one and only topic that continually causes me to cringe is our past and present treatement of our First Nations people.
What amazed me even more, when working a summer job at Customs Canada, was hearing civil servants complain about "those people" who don't even pay taxes and just lie about drunk downtown. I don't know about you but if I was forced, within several generations, to watch most of my people die of foreign diseases, have my freedom and land taken away from me, be moved to the land nobody wanted and be forced to catch up with about a thousand years of European cultural development, not to mention a possible genetic predisposition to alcoholism, I'd be a little bummed.
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Bush Blinks
First, let's do away with the idea that Meiers' nomination was withdrawn because they couldn't release documentation without giving away too much information about inner White House workings. That's the convenient excuse. It was withdrawn because her confirmation hearing risked showing a fractured and divided Republican party.
I was never sure that she had all the necessary qualifications, but the fact that the religious right really didn't like her seemed a good start. I think that the withdrawal is a dangerous sign. It indicates that the ultra-conservative funadmentalists not only have a firm grip on the White House, but most of the Republican party too.
Bush doesn't seem to be a president who likes to be forced to do anything so it will be interesting to see how he reacts. That said, however, he's never faced this much opposition from his base before (his base is much more concerned about overturning Roe vs Wade than drastic overspending or rash wars). He blinked once by withdrawing Meiers. Let's see if he blinks again.
I was never sure that she had all the necessary qualifications, but the fact that the religious right really didn't like her seemed a good start. I think that the withdrawal is a dangerous sign. It indicates that the ultra-conservative funadmentalists not only have a firm grip on the White House, but most of the Republican party too.
Bush doesn't seem to be a president who likes to be forced to do anything so it will be interesting to see how he reacts. That said, however, he's never faced this much opposition from his base before (his base is much more concerned about overturning Roe vs Wade than drastic overspending or rash wars). He blinked once by withdrawing Meiers. Let's see if he blinks again.
Tuesday, October 25, 2005
Thursday's the day (perhaps)

Monday, October 24, 2005
We're #43! We're #43!

Thursday, October 20, 2005
Farewell Mary Lou

Am I the only one who notices the passage of time through the comings and goings of CBC journalists? Peter Mansbridge loosing his hair and now eerily blond/white. Wendy Mesley fighting breast cancer. So much for the dream that the Canada I'll return to will be exactly the one I left. Sigh.
At Least We Get Our Own Currency

Wednesday, October 19, 2005
The Noose is Tightening

Tuesday, October 18, 2005
This Is All Happening Too Quickly For Me

I think this is all just a cunning plan to yet again cancel Condoleeza's trip to Canada.
As mentioned in Shakespeare's Sister, it's amazing that Bush can get away without having to address any of this for so long. One of the advantages to the parliamentary system in Canada and Britain is that the Prime Minister has to answer questions at least occasionally in question period.
Monday, October 17, 2005
Batten the Hatches

I work for a very small company in sector of the economy that has mostly really big players. I feel for Pierre Pettigrew. Negotiating from a position of weakness sucks.
Be sure to check out the comment section at the bottom of the page where Dr. Benedict Garry puts Canada in its place. I can only imagine that he's an ex-pat too (I find it hard to imagine that an American with such a low opinion of Canada would spend any time at the Globe and Mail website). Here's a little tip. If you're an ex-pat and it was your hatred for your country that made you leave, perhaps it's best for everyone if you don't look back.
Poor Barbara


As a side, note has anyone else noticed how so many right-wing commentators in the states are foreign? Seems like every second one I hear is ex-British or ex-Australian.
The Miers plot thickens

Sunday, October 16, 2005
Judith Speaks

You can read Judith Miller's own account of her grand jury testimony here . It gives a glimpse into her interactions with Libby and what Fitzgerald might be angling for in the investigation. I'm not sure it was worth 85 days in jail, though.
The Times Speaks
If you have the time or patience, the New York Times has an 8 page article on the Judith Miller debacle . I'll summarize it for you. Fellow journalists at the Times are puzzled and annoyed. Editors regret something but it's not entirely clear what. They also stand by their decision to back a reporter, but pretty much admit they wish it hadn't been Judith Miller they had to back. She, however, still thinks she accomplished something and that the biggest failing has been the inability of her and the NY Times to explain to everyone just what a great sacrifice she's made for the freedom of the press.
No mention of any annoyance or anger expressed by readers.
No mention of any annoyance or anger expressed by readers.
Canada: the new Estonia

It's nice to know that some things don't change. Ever since Monika Schnarr won the Supermodel of the World competition about 20 years ago, Canada's been known as a hot-bed for up and coming models (and let's not forget Linda Evangelista). Something about the clean living being good for the skin. Or maybe it's because Canadians are too polite to tell makeup artists to stop gluing strange objects to their faces. Anyway, apparently Canada is now the new Estonia . Yay us.
Wednesday, October 12, 2005
American Hubris
One of the advantages of not being a superpower is that it's hard to believe you can do just about anything. Sure, sometimes that means you spend a bit too much time navel-gazing and wringing your hands over smaller issues, but it can keep you grounded.
America's belief in itself is both a blessing and a curse. It can lead to some impressive achievements: landing on the moon, Silicon Valley, and Gravity Probe B come to mind. But when it surprises you that you can't control the outcome of war , that's got to fall under the curse category.
America's belief in itself is both a blessing and a curse. It can lead to some impressive achievements: landing on the moon, Silicon Valley, and Gravity Probe B come to mind. But when it surprises you that you can't control the outcome of war , that's got to fall under the curse category.
Things Are Getting Interesting
If you're like me, you're salivating over the possiblity of a surprising outcome from the Plame enquiry. This morning, the internet is positively humming with rumours of a widened net which could catch several big fish including Rove, Libby, and even Cheney . Fasten your seatbelts.
Tuesday, October 11, 2005
Relativism, The NY Times, and Intelligent Design
It's official. I'm so over the New York Times . As of today, I'm in search of a good American newspaper.
Perhaps it's because I'm older and more critical, but journalistic standards seem to have really dropped. Relativistic journalism is now the norm: the Democrats say this but the Republicans say that, or Environmentalists say this but Big Business says that. Surely there are some facts which can help us determine which side is closer to the truth.
Relativistic education is next: evolution says this but intelligent design says that. What about the ability of theories to lead to new knowledge and new technologies? Vaccines to fight evolving viruses, for example. We do all agree that viruses can mutate and thereby evolve, don't we? If we're forever lost in the middle ground of thinking that we just can't know and just have to marvel at the mystery of it all, we won't get anywhere.
Anyway, the final straw for me was the coverage (or lack thereof) of the Judy Miller story at the Times. As has been written by Arianna Huffington and many others, the Times coverage of this story has been disingenuous at best. No mention of the fact that this reporter might be seen as covering for the government. Instead, she is constantly portrayed in the Times as an honest yet humble reporter standing up for the rights of her sources against the government. But what if it's the government investigating the government? The Times is silent on that. And I've had enough.
Perhaps it's because I'm older and more critical, but journalistic standards seem to have really dropped. Relativistic journalism is now the norm: the Democrats say this but the Republicans say that, or Environmentalists say this but Big Business says that. Surely there are some facts which can help us determine which side is closer to the truth.
Relativistic education is next: evolution says this but intelligent design says that. What about the ability of theories to lead to new knowledge and new technologies? Vaccines to fight evolving viruses, for example. We do all agree that viruses can mutate and thereby evolve, don't we? If we're forever lost in the middle ground of thinking that we just can't know and just have to marvel at the mystery of it all, we won't get anywhere.
Anyway, the final straw for me was the coverage (or lack thereof) of the Judy Miller story at the Times. As has been written by Arianna Huffington and many others, the Times coverage of this story has been disingenuous at best. No mention of the fact that this reporter might be seen as covering for the government. Instead, she is constantly portrayed in the Times as an honest yet humble reporter standing up for the rights of her sources against the government. But what if it's the government investigating the government? The Times is silent on that. And I've had enough.
Monday, October 10, 2005
So Good It Hurts

After having just finished off a package of these, I started thinking about food that I continue to eat after it causes me pain. I simply can't eat maltesers without pushing them to the roof of my mouth and sucking on the chocolate until a hole breaks through to the crunchy centre which quickly dissolves on my tongue. Unfortunately this delicious process is lethal for the roof of my mouth. I'll be regretting my binging for several days now.
What other foods can't you stop eating until the damage is done? Freezies come to mind : the ones in plastic casing that cuts into the sides of your mouth. Then, of course, there's the brainfreeze that comes from my all-time favourite:

Sunday, October 09, 2005
Ex-Pat Must-Have

I've got mine and I love it. Get yours here.
It brings back warm memories of Hinterland's Who's Who. You know: learning about the ptarmigan or the loon and that slightly depressing themesong in flute.
Could Oprah Viewers Find Bin Laden?

Last week, Oprah helped catch one of the FBI's most wanted. Has anyone thought about getting her to help catch this man?
